Saturday, November 20, 2010

Somebody's Asked Me To Be An Expert In Something: Part 9: The Red Shoes



The Red Shoes is a movie about creation and obsession and the fine line between the two. It is, for my money, one of the most sensual movies ever made.

I would not be the first to call The Red Shoes a dream like movie. But what is often missed is how it is dreamlike. We are not speaking here of Carollian dream logic, and visual whimsy. But a dark and powerful undercurrent unable to be articulated except in images and symbols.

This is aided by Jack Cardiff, one of the greatest cinematographer’s of all time. The film as you will see was shot in three strip Technicolor. One of the most beautiful film stocks ever used, which to the feeling of dreamlike intensity that pervades the film. A feeling and technique that reaches its dizzying pitch at the ballet at the center of the film. A masterful sequence that we’ll discuss in more depth tomorrow.

It would be easy for the film’s overwhelming beauty and style to overpower the film, luckily the film has the strength both thematically and narratively to match the images.

It is no mistake that the film’s story, and the ballet the cast performs, is based upon a fairy tale. It is upon that same, primal, nearly mythic level that the story operates.

The story is a simple one, and one could see it, with a slight nudge of tone, easily fitting into an MGM musical with Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney. After all it is at the core, a love triangle between a plucky young musician, a girl he makes a star overnight, and the grumpy ole’ impresario who wants to split them apart.

What makes the movie a masterpiece is that unlike how the above scenario would be handled in America, The nature of the triangle here is not really a romantic or sexual one. At least not for Lermontov, the impresario, and not entirely for Ms. Page, the dancer, either. It’s not a question of love, Lermontov knows he will never create better for anyone else, while Ms. Page knows that no one will ever create better for her. Poor Julian Craster may make her happy, but he will never make her great. The question is which is more important. And the film provides no answer.

Really that is what The Red Shoes is. Nothing less than the greatest movie about artistic creation ever made. About the mania that fuels is, and the sacrifice that it requires. About the differences between those willing to dedicate the full of themselves to the ideal, and those who are merely dabbling. Much has been written about why what happens at the end happens. For me the answer is simple. Like the girl in the fable, she cannot have both the dance and a life. They exclude each other even if one without the other, is not worth it.

Her last desperate act melds the two, if only for a moment.

She is wearing the Red Shoes. What’s more she has chosen to wear them. You tell me if her fate could be any other.

Friday, November 19, 2010

Blue Collar: Yaphet Kotto Kotto Week


(This is my entry to the Tribute To Yaphet Kotto week that has spread across The Interwebs. Here's the schedule. Check it out.

MONDAY Nov. 15th
Unflinching Eye - Alien
Raculfright 13's Blogo Trasho - Truck Turner

TUESDAY Nov. 16th
Lost Video Archive - Raid on Entebbe
Manchester Morgue - Friday Foster

WEDNESDAY Nov. 17th
Booksteve's Library - Live and Let Die

THURSDAY Nov. 18th
Mondo 70 - Drum
B Movies and Beyond - The Monkey Hu$tle

FRIDAY Nov. 19th
Ninja Dixon - Across 110th St.
Lines That Make Things - The A Team (TV episode)
Things That Don't Suck - Blue Collar

SATURDAY Nov. 20th
Breakfast In the Ruins - Bone
Lost Video Archive - The Park Is Mine
)

They pit the lifers against the new boy and the young against the old. The black against the white. Everything they do is to keep us in our place.

-Yaphet Kotto-

Blue Collar is a Paddy Chayefskyian social satire cum crime film stuck in a pressure cooker. Whose tension and palatable pressure reflect the notoriously fraught shoot. If there’s a film that can match Taxi Driver pound for pound on the level of sheer unrelieved unbearable tension Blue Collar is it.

Blue Collar follows three Detroit Auto workers, played by Richard Pryor, Harvey Keitel, and the man the week is dedicated to, Mr. Yaphet Kotto. They plot a break in, when they get wind of a Union Safe that’s supposed to have some under reported dues in it that could easily disappear. It doesn’t but what it does have is a ledger linking the corrupt Union explicitly to the mafia. It doesn’t take the organization long to figure out just who pulled the heist, and even less to divvy them up into those who will play ball and those who won’t.


Even in its opening moments set in the status quo Collar is all intensity. The manufacturing jobs the protagonists work are portrayed as hard and dirty. Everyone on screen is caked in sweat and grime, smoke and flames leap out from the corners of the frames. The characters aren’t even allowed so much as a moments respite in the break room without the vending machines stealing their money. The opening scenes have already painted the world as completely intolerable. Playing in miniature like Schrader’s version of No Exit. Hell is not other people. Hell is working with other people in a dark, hot, grimy hole with flames. Which ironically brings us back to the Orthodox view of hell.

Even the union hall meeting, the simple act of sitting around a rec room complaining, seems like a dangerous act. As the pitiful union rep attempts to talk the assembled workers into spending their Saturday passing out flyers, after we witnessed the shift they just worked. Even before anything is evidently “wrong” in Blue Collar its evident that it all is. Every character seems wired to explode from the word go.

We catch glimpses and snatches of our three leads during this opening montage but our first good look at one is Richard Pryor, not Kotto. During Pryor’s opening rant at the Union meeting. Pryor famously did not have a good time on the film. Reputedly refusing to do more then three takes, pulling a gun on Schrader, and finally only agreeing to finish filming if Schrader promised never to make a film again.

Whatever Schrader did to earn Pryor’s ire it was worth it. However far out of his comfort zone he may be, it stands that this is Pryor’s only successful dramatic role and arguably his only successful on screen role period. In his introductory scene Pryor snarls and paces the floor, using the familiar syntax and speech patterns of his stand up career to startling different affect. While on stage Pryor’s persona and wit made him appear invulnerable and rock star like. His tirade here about a broken locker merely makes him appear impotent. Complaining about things he has no hope of changing, even some petty indignity like a busted locker.

The irony of course is that the union rep that Pryor is complaining to, is just as impotent as Pryor is. He protests his helplessness to change things, and he’s right. In the opening minutes Schrader has painted a world in which the real powers that be are so far removed from the principle characters that it might as well be fictional.

Even the bar the workers retreat to isn’t any meaningful break. Its small cramped and dirty and even the ball busting and storytelling the leads participate in is cut with an air of danger. The scene perfectly displays Schrader’s economy as a screenwriter, the dynamics between the characters are firmly established within minutes of them being in the room together. And when an actor as intense as Harvey Keitel is playing the straight man, you know things are going to go very wrong.

Kotto is the Wildman of the group. But also the only one who really appreciates what’s going on. While Pryor is beaten down by the little indignities, and Keitel gets shaken out of his stupor when due to his lack of a dental plan his twelve year old daughter tries operating on herself with pliers, Kotto knows that the game is rigged against them from beginning. The one most willing and able to call bullshit bullshit. And he pays for it.

In a small piece of genius cutting, even the escape of the weekend is cut short, we cut directly from the door of the barroom shutting behind Keitel to the assembly line. After a quick series of shots displaying the job with the same gritty authenticity of the opening montage, we cut back to the squat little bar, as the factory workers flood in after punching out. The message is clear, these characters are stuck in an endless loop. Once again, there is literally “no exit”. Even Pryor’s faux jovial cries of “Party! Party” ring hollow.

Schrader’s Blue Collar America is fully integrated both in term’s of race and gender. Its not racial, ethnic, and gender tensions, but power and money, and in Schrader’s land those two things are synonymous. This is illustrated in the next scene where a FBI agent disguised as a Grad student, conducts a tense interview with Pryor, Keitel and Kotto, for a sociological study. It's another great example of economy, serving both as exposition, introducing the mysterious Eddie Johnson, thematically underlining the class tensions, and as a canny bit of misdirection. After all Schrader, who had only a few years ago become famous for being the most highly paid screen writer of all time, has as little in common with his characters of as the bemused grad student, or for that matter Barton Fink, John Sullivan or any other Hollywood type mocked for their desire to portray “The Common Man”. By finding another character to pin the label of upper class voyeur to, Schrader avoids having to wear it himself.

Its not until twenty minutes in that this cycle breaks, and even then it hardly brings relief. Pryor is visited by an IRS agent who hits him with a wallop of back taxes, while Pryor who has claimed three more kids then he actually has, desperately tries to pass off three of the neighbor’s children as his own. Like in the union hall, Pryor breaks into a monologue that recalls his stand up persona,

“I take home two-ten a week man, goddamn. I gotta pay for the lights, gas, clothes, food... every fuckin' thing, man. I'm left with about thirty bucks after all the fuckin' bills are paid. Gimme a break, will ya mister? Fuck Uncle Sam, man! They give the fuckin' politicians a break! Agnew and 'em don't pay shit! Working man's gotta pay every goddamn thing! : Yeah I know I'll pay it! If I had the Navy and Marines behind me, I'd be a muthafucka too!”



Like before Pryor’s intelligence, wit, and hyper verbal nature only serve to underline his powerlessness in the face of bureaucracy.

A further division is established between the family men Pryor and Keitel, who have to worry about back taxes and braces for the kids, and the single Kotto, who in the films one nod to the swinging seventies holds a coke party in which all enthusiastically participate. This is where the plan to rob the plant is launched. It starts in elated debauchery. But like the scene in the bar, all the drugs and sex offers only the most temporary of escapes. The scene hasn’t played a minute before Schrader launches from the giddy into its brutal come down, with the trio in a drugged up daze, contemplating the shit their lives have turned into.

Even their rebellion ultimately comes in service to the machine. The corrupt union uses the break in as a handy opportunity to cover some of the money trail. Alleging a loss of over ten thousand dollars after the disappearance of a mere six hundred. Pryor, Keitel and Kotto are still pawns of it. Still nothing more then dupes.

Kotto, the most surfacely amoral of them, does ultimately become the film’s conscience, and his is the one unambiguous moment of victory in the film. In which in an eruption of Schraderian violence Kotto intercepts and then opens a can of whoop ass on a couple of leg breakers sent after Keitel’s wife (Note the picture of Christ hanging over Kotto’s shoulder when he’s introduced. Setting up his on coming sacrifice).

The scene where Kotto is asphyxiated in a set up in the paint room is textbook Schraderian violence. Ugly, clumsy, slow and sad. Its violence without even the dignity of a perpetrator. The ultimate brutality of the faceless that has been running through the film. Kotto ends up both literally and figuratively the victim of the machine.

Pryor in his willingness to sell out becomes the ultimate Schrader Protagonist. So defeated that he doesn’t even have the cold comfort of his moral outrage and clarity to protect him any longer. Like Scott in Hardcore and Nolte in Affliction he is a man consumed and destroyed by what he faces. Kotto on the other hand is destroyed physically, but not spiritually by the world. He allows the machine to destroy him, but not to corrupt him. And when the film end’s it is his voice that provides that haunting final line.



Thursday, November 18, 2010

The Unseen #52: The Age Of Consent




Why'd I Buy It?: Came in Michael Powell Boxset I Purchased

Why Haven't I Watched It?: It's one of Powell's few post Peeping Tom Films and thus has a slim to none reputation.

How Was It?:Age Of Consent is a deeply flawed film, though ultimately a rewarding one.

James Mason plays an artist who has lost some of his spark. His work, hanging in bourgesis galleries is being evaluated less on it’s aesthetic, and more on how well it will fit in that open space above the fireplace.


Attempting to rejuvenate he retreats to a small island in Australia, where he meets a young Helen Mirren who inspires a late period spurt of creativity. While he in turn inspires in her the self confidence she needs to put the place, and her Gollum like horrible Alkie Grandmother in the rearview.

Had the movie stuck solely to Mason and his relationship with Mirren in this strange place; rekindling both the enjoyment of his art, while unmistakably passing the torch at the end of his career, Age Of Consent may have been a minor masterpiece. As well as a prescient metaphor about the relationship Powell would have with the American New Wave directors.

Unfortunately Powell decides to shoehorn in some rather broad comedy. When I say the film plays this material (and the scenes involving the Grandmother) Broad I mean BROAD. Everything is so shrill and so ugly and ungainly that I was tempted to think this film was directed by some other Michael Powell and was placed in a box set of his work on accident.

Mason’s boorish horny friend comes to the island accompanied by music better suited to a lesser Benny Hill vehicle. He runs around naked on the beach. Women stare at his dong. We also get plenty of comic interludes involving the hick islanders with the exaggeration turned up to eleven. In short a sensitive coming of age/graceful twilight film gets buried under Michael Powell’s Porkys.

And yet it can’t bury it completely.

Mason, who at this point in his career usually just set the temperature to “fey” and waited till the timer went off, is obviously as invested in the movie as Powell. Bringing a string of vulnerability to his artist along with his trademark wit and sophistication. (His Australian Accent wanders in and out at will though).

He's muse is played by a then unknown Helen Mirren. Helen Mirren’s late period hotness is such a matter of public record that it’s difficult to remember that she did not emerge from the womb a sexy septuagenarian. Yet here she is, in her debut roll, young and borderline feral (Also oft naked. But it’s Helen Mirren so that’s not really a surprise). It’s no wonder she inspires Mason, it’s not as simple as sex thing. Indeed that element is only introduced, somewhat awkwardly at the last possible moment, and only the leering theme song (sample lyrics "Cora Cora I love you so/As I've waited Cora and watched you grow/And now that you're reaching The Age of Consent/ The Talking is over/ Love me my Cora" GAH!) generates any real ickiness. It’s just that she has so much of what Mason used to have.

While the film doesn’t have Powell’s usual eye melting visual brilliance, he does bring a meditative air to the film. The best scenes are a pair of long dialogue free passages where the characters simply takes the alieness of their surroundings in. The first in which Mason explores the woods of the island under a canopy of chattering bats, the second a long dreamy underwater swim. In moments like these, and the sensitive story at its center Age Of Consent reveals itself to be a film that no one but Powell could make.

There’s a lovely movie here, you just need to crane your neck a bit to see it.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The 49th Parallel




The 49th Parallel is another of The Archers films that are explicitly part of the war effort. What made Powell and Pressburger’s films unique, is that unlike most propaganda there films were not necessarily aimed at their native country and are instead aimed squarely at the foreign market. They either like The Life And Death Of Colonel Blimp, and A Cantebury Tale attempt to explain the English character in terms of cinema; or like A Matter Of Life And Death, and The 49 Parallel emphasize that we are all in this together. And not in a fuzzy handholding way either, but as in “We’re all on Germany’s hitlist so best if we stop squabbling before they kill us.”

The 49th Parallel deals with a Nazi invasion of Canada, a small U-Boat crew intended as saboteurs lands on Canadian shores. They’re discovered and have their U-Boat and half their forces killed. They run, trying to make it for The United States (still neutral at the time of filming) and cutting a wide swatch through a cross section of Canadian culture.

The amazing thing about watching The 49th Parallel, is that it’s not treating Nazi’s as serial villains convenient for their scary uniforms and tendency to bellow. Nor are they a ghoulish worst case scenario tucked safely away in history and hindsight. Rather the Nazi’s in The 49th Parrellel are a frightening and very real option.

Like all of The Archer’s films The 49th Parellel is a film only an Englishman could make. Even the best American Propoganda of the era has to it a certain sense of gee whiz remove. A cocky sense of how much fun it’s going to be to kick these guy’s asses. The 49th Parallel is too desperate for that, it could only have been made by people who actually had Nazi’s bombing their country and its civilian population, a film made by people who watched friends, neighbors and family fall to Nazi bombs everyday. There is nothing abstract about them.

This is the first Archer’s film I’ve seen in Black and White rather then their trademark surreal and dreamy color. The work is beautiful, but stark and fits well, giving the film a sense of immediacy, while The Archer’s usually focused more on elegance.




One of Powell and Pressburger’s attributes has always been their ability to create nationalism in their cinema that was never distasteful. They demonstrate the ability to transplant that in The 49th Parrellel. The Nazi’s are not so much repelled by an individual (the way Errol Flynn or John Wayne most certainly would if the film was American made) but by Canada itself. The country’s national character will not allow such a perversion and its people and character acts like antibodies against the foreign intrusion.

As with A Matter Of Life And Death, there are moments where the film just stops so the characters are allowed to state the point of the film. But rather then making the film stagier, it makes it more urgent. It’s a film that has no time for niceties, it’s a polemic only because the stakes are so high.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Help A Brother Out




You may not know him, but Matt Suzaka proud proprietor of Chuck Norris Ate My Baby is one of the good guys.

A funny literate writer, who spends an awful lot of his time giving smaller blogs (including this one) a leg up.

He could use a hand right now, I'll let him give you the details. But what amounts to on your part is really no more then a few minutes and a mouse clip.


If you've got a few minutes help a brother out.

The Unseen #51: A Matter Of Life And Death




Why’d I Buy It?: Two Michael Powell films for the price of the average forgettable studio blockbuster? With analysis by Scorsese? No way was I passing it by.

Why Haven’t I Watched It?: No real reason. It’s always nice to keep a few really juicy titles in reserve.

How Was It?: A Matter of Life And Death starts with a title card informing us that however much the place our young airman, played by David Niven, may look like heaven it is not. And is further more all in the victim’s head. It’s a strange, almost stern opening and it just gets stranger.

The first proper shot is a long slow pan of nothing less then universe in it’s entirety. The shot brings to mind another WWII film concerning angels with the same opening shot, It’s A Wonderful Life. Though while that shot is undercut by a lush soothing score and the a dialogue track composed of prayers, before settling on a cluster of stars revealed to be nothing less then God himself. A Matter Of Life And Death on the other hand, supplies a cool clipped British voice lecturing on the cosmos, before almost reluctantly panning down to consider the Earth, and the second World War.

It’s a curiously unsentimental way to start a film. Particularly one about a young airman who forsakes Heaven for love. The message of It’s A Wonderful Life’s opening shot is that even in the vastness of the universe there is still someone whose looking out for old George Bailey. The message of A Matter Of Life And Death’s opening shot is that against the face of eternity even the defining conflict of the 20th Century amounts to exactly “fuck all”.

Powell and Pressberger did not take the expected approach.

Then again, when did they ever?

This isn’t to say that A Matter Of Life And Death is a joyless film. Far from it, it’s a film of keen wit (In one of the best moments Powell slyly sums up the difference between American’s and Europeans thusly. That upon reaching the afterlife The Americans make a beeline for the Coke machine). And like all the Archer’s films, in terms of visuals it’s staggering in both sophistication and invention. In a keen bit of subversion, life on Earth is presented in Powell’s trademark ultra saturated three strip Technicolor, while the eerie abstract Heaven is presented in monochrome. The cinematography by master Jack Cardiff and production design by Alfred Junge is beyond superlative (What's more in regards to Cardiff, there's a shot of an eyelid closing that nearly short circuited my brain with a case of the "How the fuck did they do thats?")








It’s just that the overall tone of the film is a lot closer to Carnival Of Soul’s then Defending Your Life, despite what the presence of deft comic performers like David Niven and Kim Hunter would have you expect, though they do bring their trademark sophistication to bear, with their unusually touching love story. Though nothing outright “horrifying” happens, things are unsettling in their impersonalness. To once again bring up the It’s a Wonderful Life Parrellel rather then a chubby homely angel begging Niven to cling to life, we have a foppish Frenchman (played by the great Powell regular Maurice Goering) pestering him to embrace death, for reasons no grander then bureaucratic annoyance.

The film was made, like the earlier Cantebury Tale, partially to convince America that allowing England to be bulldozed into the ground by Germany would be a bad idea (Though it wasn’t released until 1946) and thusly the many many pleas for Euro American friendship come off as a little heavy handed.

Yet, these entreaties only further ground the film in it’s particular time and place, and give the film a further sense of urgency (World War II may not mean much to the cosmos but we’re pretty happy that it ended the way it did down here).

A Matter Of Life And Death may in the end, be absolutely nothing like I expected. But it is something better. Just like all of Michael Powell film’s. A beautiful, strange, and meditate film, The Archers prove once more to be the masters of the ineffable cinematic dream state.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Odds N' Sods

(Someone thought this was a good idea)

Just a few quick jots on the ole agenda. As you may have noticed, in the sidebar I'll be taking part in a kind of floating tribute, masterminded by Napalm Seth, dedicated to the only man who could keep his dignity after being associated with that image. The one the only Yaphet Kotto.

There's some great blogs involved, here's the itinerary, hope you check everyone out.

MONDAY Nov. 15th
Unflinching Eye - Alien
Raculfright 13's Blogo Trasho - Truck Turner
Camp Movie Camp -

TUESDAY Nov. 16th
Lost Video Archive - Raid on Entebbe
Manchester Morgue - Friday Foster

WEDNESDAY Nov. 17th
Booksteve's Library - Live and Let Die
Horror Section - Warning Sign

THURSDAY Nov. 18th
Mondo 70 - Drum
B Movies and Beyond - The Monkey Hu$tle
Illogical Contraption - Eye of the Tiger

FRIDAY Nov. 19th
Ninja Dixon - Across 110th St.
Lines That Make Things - The A Team (TV episode)
Things That Don't Suck - Blue Collar

SATURDAY Nov. 20th
Breakfast In the Ruins - Bone
Lost Video Archive - The Park Is Mine

...


And while we're on the promotion train, Planet Of Terror, a tireless advocate of independent horror and great friend to the site, has gotten all hot and bothered over In Memorium. An independent Horror film now available streaming.

Though I haven't seen the movie yet, what POT's been asking for isn't so much an endorsement but help spreading the word that the movie actually exists. Something I'm more then happy to do. Half the time that's the hardest thing about independent film in the first place.

So go over there and read up on In Memorium, I can assure you with Cortez as excited as he is, In Memorium won't remain unwatched by me for long.

...






Michael Powell. Emeric Pressburger. Together they became The Archers and fought crime made some of the greatest films ever.

This Saturday I'm hosting a screening of The Red Shoes, and so I figured that I'd spend the time between then and now writing about them. So aside from the aforementioned Kotto related interlude, it's going to be all Archers all the time (well technically there is at least one film I'll be writing about that's just Powell. And it's not the one you're thinking of) I'm going to try to use the same writing skills I usually use to write about horror films and bitch about Hollywood, to write about some of the most beautiful, lyrical, borderline ineffable movies of all time.

This will be interesting.