Monday, February 18, 2013

You Must Think I'm Pretty Sick...


I had the honor of writing up Taxi Driver for The Muriels. Yeah no pressure on that one. It's only arguably the greatest film by my favorite director embodying an era of experimentation unparalleled by any in American Cinema.  Just go ahead and wing it

That said I'm actually pretty happy with how the essay came out. Of course I wasn't able to unpack all of Taxi Driver's complexities, you'd need at least a monograph for that, and even then I have my doubts. But I'm fairly certain its coherent. Probably. 

Inspeaking of long standing traditions I showed up at The On The Stick's Annual yearly retrospective to discuss the year in film with the usual gang of Chowdaheads. A good time is had by all

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

John Dies At The End




I wish I liked John Dies At The End a lot more than I do. Don’t get me wrong, on one level I’m absolutely gung ho. After all, this is an independently financed passion project from a great horror director (Don Coscarelli, believed in the project so much he sunk his own money into the work even before John was picked up by a major publisher) based on the signature novel of one of my favorite authors. To add another twist, the film is currently undertaking one of the most ambitious on demand releases since the start of that experiment. An attempt to build word of mouth, while simultaneously releasing the film in theaters. An attempt that seems to be working. (I myself had intended to hold off until a theatrical release, but the spirit is willing the flesh is yadayadayada, so I ended up making this my first "On Demand" film)

So at the very least you have a fun movie, that is a passion project from an honorable filmmaker, which will expose thousands of new fans to one of my favorite authors, all while proving viable a new form of distribution that will allow more interesting and risky genre cinema to be made.

And I can’t quite help but feel that it misses the point entirely.

Let’s back paddle a second here, if you haven’t read them the John books by “David Wong” (A pseudonym for Jason Pargin) does for horror what Douglas Adams does for Science Fiction. Following John and Dave, two low prospect men who take a drug called Soy Sauce which gives them incredible quantum insight into the universe, but also puts them in the sights of a malignant being beyond space and time. Through some bizarre alchemy he creates books that are simultaneously hilariously funny, genuinely frightening, and which tackle the big philosophical questions in between the dick jokes and exploding heads. The average page of Wong will make you laugh, cringe and then contemplate the implications of The Dunbar Number on humanity’s future. And all the while Wong races towards the apocalypse with gleeful abandon.

John Dies At The End, gets the gleeful abandon part but skips the rest. On one level, it’s actually quite smart as an adaptation. Wong wrote a book with a very particular structure, (it was originally written as three novellas released for free on the internet) and which would require a Michael Bay budget to pull off. Coscarelli skips both headaches, by reordering most scenes and repurposing others, creating what is basically a faithful adaptation in an entirely new framework (a new framework that as you might guess skips some of the more expensive bits). And if you think that’s easy to do I have a long sad story about Cloud Atlas to tell you. Only once, when a popular character from the novels is basically trotted out as “a special guest star” does this technique come off as as awkward.

What John lacks is not narrative faithfulness, nor exploding heads. It keeps the gleeful abandon of John Dies At The End, but it forgets that gleeful abandon is not the thing that made that work special in the first place. What made Wong’s novel stick is as about an accurate portrait of alienation as you’re going to find outside of a Camus novel, coupled with the work’s absolute fearlessness in tackling heady philosophical and existential dilemmas. I didn’t expect all of that to be in the film, but I didn’t expect none if it to be there either.

There is little to separate John Dies At The End from any number of films made by dudes who love Evil Dead 2 a whole lot. Now don’t get me wrong there’s nothing wrong with this, I am nothing if not a guy who loves Evil Dead 2 a whole lot, I’m considering having it chiseled on my tombstone. Taken on its own merits John Dies At The End is an innovative, creative slice of genre fun, with some great moments. If that’s what you’re looking for, and you’re feeling adventurous and have seven bucks in your pocket that you don’t know what to do with, I highly suggest you give the film a whirl on demand, or see it when its released in one of these new fangled “Theaters”. Just do yourself a favor, think of it as the trailer for the book.

...

If you want to hear more thoughts on The John novels, you can find them in Son Of Danse Macabre. Available from Amazon and Barnes And Noble.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Things That Definitely Don't Suck...




A couple of things I want to mention, first, in an ongoing attempt to make me believe the universe is actually messing with me, I was reviewed by Famous Monsters Of Filmland. Yes, that one. No I'm not totally freaking out or anything.

If you are filled by that review with a desire to read Son Of Danse Macabre I can understand the impulse. As always it's available on Amazon and through Barnes And Noble.

Also for the second year in a row, I have been invited to participate in the prestigious Muriel Awards.


The Muriels are a collective of some of the finest bloggers on the web, ring led by Paul Clark and Steve Carlson, who spend a hell of a lot of selfless time putting all this together. My hats off to them and as always I'm honored to be included. 

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Son Of Danse Macabre: Self Interview: AKA Schizophrenia For Fun And Profit

My friend, poet, Browns fan and all around swell guy Nick Courtwright, tagged me in a self interview chain that is making its way around the interwebs. I will of course be talking about Son Of Danse Macabre, shocker I know, currently available here aaaannnddd here.




What is the working title of the book?

Son Of Danse Macabre: A Personal History Of Horror.


Where did the idea come from for the book?

Stephen King’s Danse Macabre was one of my favorite books growing up. I was a lonely kid and being able to carry around what amounted to a pocket conversation with my favorite author was just beyond cool. Let alone all the great books and films it introduced me to.

There just weren’t a lot of people who were into what I was into, were I was growing up. Fandom could be lonely pre internet. Danse Macabre was just a great confirmation that “You’re not crazy for liking this stuff, in fact here’s someone who cares about it just as much as you do. I always wanted a follow up, and I saw I had a neatly mirrored chunk of time to the original, so I just decided to go for it.


What genre does your book fall under?

That’s surprisingly tough to decide. Of course it all falls under the blanket of criticism, but some of it’s Lit Crit, and some of it’s Film crit and there’s different rules for each. Also there’s just a touch of memoir in it.


 What is the one sentence synopsis of your book?

A comprehensive look at the horror genre’s evolution over the last thirty years across media.


How long did it take you to write the first draft of the manuscript?


Eleven months, almost exactly.

Who or what inspired you to write this book?

I think we’ve got that one covered.
What else about your book might pique the reader’s interest?


I tried to hit a spot where someone who had never seen a horror film before could use this as a primer, and yet someone who had seen EVERY horror film would find it interesting too. I think I hit it.

Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

Self Published, gotta get that sweet sweet Government Cheese money somehow.


My tagged writers for next Wednesday are:

I’ve still got a few slots for this open, if you’ve got something you want to promote send me an email. 


Monday, January 21, 2013

Best Films Of 2012




5th Annual Southland Tales Award For A Film I Like For No Damn Reason: The Man With The Iron Fists: This is a bit of a cheat. After all I know damn well why I love The Man With The Iron Fists. But given its sense of relentless abandon, in its gleeful, borderline deranged pursuit of fetishism, given its eagerness to shred the limits of style and good taste as though they were tissue paper (At one point Russell Crowe pulls out a string of anal beads with his teeth) given the crazed fever dream love of it all. I would say that The Man With The Iron Fists more than its place.



Worst: Savages: I don’t know which makes me madder, the toothless, cliched, flaccid film that Oliver Stone and company made out of Don Winslow’s jet black, darkly hilarious, lunatic farce of Bad meeting Evil, or how many intelligent critics gave the film a mystifying pass.

By absolving the characters of all the consequences and responsibility for their actions, Stone might have found a story might have made the story palatable to a mass audience, but he sure didn’t make anything worthwhile. And the voiceover. Jesus Wept. If this and The Life And Death Of Bobby Z is the best that Hollywood can do with Winslow’s work than I pray that no one ever options Power Of The Dog. Hell at this point I’m pretty sure they’d fuck up The Dawn Patrol.
Underrated: John Carter: I can see why Andrew Stanton’s idiosyncratic pulp epic failed to connect to everyone. What leaves me down right mystified is the vitriol with which audiences and critcs turned on the film. It’s a shockingly faithful rendition of one of the weirdest pulp minds of the last century, and aside from an image that can only be described as “Flying Magical Space Emperor McNulty” that admittedly left me somewhat nonplussed, it does the job beautifully.



Overhated: The Dark Knight Rises: I maintain the films only real sin is the fact that it was the sequel to Batman Begins, rather than the sequel to The Dark Knight. Well you know what? I still like Batman Begins an awful lot. And I liked this one too. Overlong? Perhaps. A few plot holes? Sure. But they’re more than outweighed by the films pleasures. From the James Bond by way of Mephistopheles opening, to Anne Hathaways calculating Selina Kyle, Tom Hardy’s preening monster, to Nolan’s eerie vision of a society ripping itself apart, The Dark Knight Rises is nothing less than a glossy deeply felt nightmare. In short a perfect venue for the character, and one of the best endings to a trilogy on record.

Overrated: Lawless: In all fairness  it’s not as though I’ve exactly read any raves of this film. But I haven’t read anything that comes close to touching the disappointment that it left me with either. Sure there were worse films released this year, but there are few things as dispiriting as watching a bunch of talented filmmakers get together with a bunch of actors I enjoy get together and produce nothing but a waste of time. Hopelessly muddled Peckinpah lite.


Most Disappointing: Prometheus: I don’t have the knee jerk hate for this film that some do. At the very least I quite admire Noomi Rapace’s performance, isolated set pieces (The self performed C section is a doozy), HR Giger’s set design, the bleak tone, and Scott’s commitment to his story. But at the end of the day as the inconsitancies, sloppy character writing, and lurching borderline nonsensical plot take hold the reaction cannot help but echo this:



Most Pleasant Surprise: Paranorman: I walked in expecting nothing but a cute film with some clever references. Instead I ended up seeing what I can say without hyperbole is one of the most breathtakingly beautifully animated films I’ve ever seen. The craft, detail and ambition (The Fountain inspired ending threatens to cause my head to explode each time I see it)  are such that I would confidently put this film up against the best that Ghibli and Pixar had to offer. The fact that its propelled by a lively script that gets surprisingly dark, and bends horror conventions in a way that is nearly as clever as Cabin In The Woods is just gravy. This missed being in the top ten by a hair.

10. The Raid: But I couldn’t very well leave this off the list could I? I’m with my compadres on The Action Cast. This should have just been released as The Rad. Gareth Evans is a director of almost insidious innovation (and if the word coming out of Sundance is any indication versatility) and The Raid is the most brutal, propulsive down right nasty slice of action filmmaking to come down the pike for quite some time. It’s the type of film where a “slow moment” involves the hero dodging a machete as its thrust through a false wall. The Raid showcases the inimitable pleasure of watching real people do things that your brain insists they cannot do.



9. Cloud Atlas: Inspeaking of seeing things that your brain insists can’t be happening. The Wackowski’s  and Tom Tywker’s beautiful, imperfect adaptation of David Mitchell’s novel is one of the most exhilarating dizzyingly ambitious films I’ve ever seen. As an adaptation it may simplify and to a certain extent muddle the narrative, but as an act of filmmaking it is impeccable. The fact that it has been shunned by so many is depressing but hardly surprising. But people will be coming back to this one long after its timid competitors have been forgotten. And that’s the true true.


8. Django Unchained: Tarantino is such a consistant voice he is an easy one to take for granted, and yes Django Unchained does confirm that when his career is considered as a whole there will most likely be a notable divide between the first two decades of his career and post Sally Menke work. But if Django is an imperfect film (or to be more accurate if it is less perfect than the films he has provided for the last decade) then it is still a film that showcases his eye for the beautiful and the grotesque, his ear for the delights and intricacies of speech, the bold fearlessness of his language and his bed rock core belief in the cathartic thrill of genre cinema. With Django he pulls off the neat trick of creating a film that simultaneously seems to have no greater purpose than the pleasure of its own inimitable style and which tackles one of the darkest chapters of American History. One that does both with equal fervor.



7. Looper: Its this simple, Rian Johnson makes movies the way I like movies to be made. Its virtually impossible to overstate how important Looper was for Johnson. While Brick has a cult following The Brothers Bloom lingers in unfortunate obscurity (It was my pick for best film of 2008). Looper proved that Johson’s voice, deeply romantic and humanistic, merciless, and puckishly innovative, could connect with a larger audience. Which is why the most exciting thing about Looper, beyond its innovative future, beyond the film literate set pieces (including an unexpected callback to The Fury so perfect I giggled in the theater the first time I saw it)  beyond the usual depth of Johnson’s characters, and weighty morality of their plight, beyond the most scrotum clenchingly awful piece of violence I saw in a theater this year, is the fact that it promises that for Johnson things are only going to be going up from here. I can’t wait to see where that leads.

6. Killer Joe: Imagine if John Waters directed The Killer Inside Me (Sudden flash of inspiration William Friedkin and Matthew McCounaughey’s Pop 1280 make it happen universe). William Friedkin’s grotesque portrait of the idiotically venal struggling to sink as low as they can has an intensity, and a warped fascination to it that I can only partially express. Centered around McCounaughey’s stunning performance as a dark absence of a man Climaxing in one of the most grotesque, and yes funny, final scenes I can recall (the final line and the look on McCounaughey’s face as he delivers it is a hoot) Killer Joe is kind of like watching home movies from hell. And its no less compelling for it. Unless there is something profoundly wrong with you Killer Joe will leave you wanting a shower. It’s like staring into the abyss and seeing the abyss grin back at you.

5. The Grey: A good ole fashioned, “They don’t make ‘em like this anymore.” Joe Carnahan proves once again that he’s one of the best pulp filmmakers working today (now for fucks sake let him make White Jazz). The Grey is a film the likes of which John Sturges or Samuel Fuller would be proud to call their own. A relentless endurance test of a film with a poetic soul that is gripping all the way from its elliptical opening to the bleak perfection of its final image. Stripped down and primal, The Grey is simply put the kind of film that reminds me why I love film. 



4. Cabin In The Woods: It would be impossible to name another film that entertained me half as much as Cabin In The Woods this year. Which is odd considering I hope I never see another film like it. Make no mistake Cabin In The Woods  is full of genre pleasures, Whedon’s dialouge and plot twist, a climax that can only be described as the greatest Joe Dante movie never made, and a game cast led by Richard Jenkins, making him the unexpected owner of my two favorite horror performances of two separate decades. But the most exhilarating thing about Cabin is the way that Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard burn this village to save it. Delivering a horror film not to end all horror films, but to begin them. Make no mistake the hand that crashes down at the end of the film is nothing less then a thrown glove. Here’s hoping that other horror filmmakers pick up the challenge.


3. Holy Motors: Perhaps the single most unquantifiable movie ever made, Few films have left me so wonderfully baffled as Holy Motors, a valentine to a vanishing world. More so than any other artform film is almost perpetually on the cusp of sea change. Now perhaps more than ever. Holy Motors embodies this feel, simultaneously an elegy for a school of filmmaking that is swiftly vanishing over the horizon, and an example of the bold new directions that are offered by the brave new world. Simply put Holy Motors is one of the most exhilarating films I’ve ever seen.



2. The Master: It is fitting that The Master is a film that deals both directly and obliquely with questions of religion. Because it is one of the most convincing portraits of hell I have ever seen. Make no mistake, that’s where the film takes place, inside a mind that is undergoing an agonizingly prolonged core meltdown. Anderson makes you sit there and share that agony for all 144 minutes of its runtime of some of the most abrasive virtuosic filmmaking I’ve ever seen.


1. Moonrise Kingdom: I don’t know if Moonrise Kingdom is Wes Anderson’s best film, but its certainly his most beautiful, and perhaps his most Wes Andersony as well. Those who complain that Anderson is inhabiting his own pocket universe miss the point. It’s not simply that Anderson has a valid artistic voice and there’s no real reason that he should change it. It’s that the films he make are delicate enough that they only can survive within said universe (and the inclusion of some very non Wes Andersony actors like Bruce Willis and Harvey Keitel only speak to just how powerful that voice is).

Awash in gorgeous melancholy, Anderson’s fable of innocence surviving experience has the audacity to suggest that despite all evidence to the contrary both people and fate can find it within themselves to be kind. And the simple invocation of that complicated idea made for the most moving experience I had in a theater this year. 

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Best Books Of 2012



Inevitable Plug: Son Of Danse Macabre, Bryce Wilson: That’s right folks I wrote a book this year and I’m still not tired of talking about it. Well I might be tired of talking about it, but I’m not tired of asking you to buy it.

Son Of Danse Macabre, is my personal history of the horror genre in the last thirty years (with some trips further back in time for foundation laying).  I’ve been told by people I trust that it is readable. It’s 2.99 on the nook and kindle and every time some one gives it a shot, my Grinch heart grows three sizes that day.


Best Of Last Year: The Whore Of Akron, Scott Raab: Somehow I missed reading The Whore Of Akron until this year. Had I read it in time it would have been my favorite book of last year. Even if you don’t give two shits about American Basketball, The Whore Of Akron is an electrifying portrait of personal passion, despair, and what it means to be from somewhere. I felt every page in my gut. Thank you Scott Raab. Though the diaspora continues, one day we will have our victory. One day Cleveland Sports will be restored.

Dayenu.


Worst: Back To The Blood, Tom Wolfe: Tom Wolfe is dead. I have been waiting twelve years for the resurrection. I shant waste my time waiting any longer.

Most Disapointing: Kings Of Cool, Don Winslow: Coming from anybody else The Kings Of Cool would be perfectly acceptable, perhaps even good. But it’s not coming from anybody else, it’s coming from Don Winslow.

On one level I can’t really blame the guy, after all Universal was nice enough to buy a 50 million dollar marketing campaign for him, he’d be a fool not to take advantage of it. And Kings Of Cool has its moments, including a tormented monologue from one of the character's parents that almost makes it worth it. But no bright moment of passion, or turn of phrase can disguise the fact that Winslow’s heart just isn’t in it.  That from the first page to the last Kings Of Cool is a book that has no damn reason to exist.

It’s the first Don Winslow book to feel anything other than essential. And that just hurts.



Who Gives A Damn If It's YA: The Fault In Our Stars: Yes The Fault In Our Stars may be written for Young Adults but its more acerbic, truthful, beautifully written and real, than most of what passes for contempary adult literature these days. One of those invaluable books where you suddenly find that you're not thinking of the characters as characters at all.

So why is is ghettoized if I truly don't give a damn whether it's "adult literature" or not? Because I shamefully forgot about it while making my outline and I don't feel like kicking any of the below books off the list. The shame is my own though not the books. Make time for it. You'll be glad, you did.



10 & 9 Some Remarks,  Neal Stephenson, Distrust That Particular Flavor, William Gibson: I have commented before that it scare the shit out of me that both Neal Stephenson and William Gibson consider the modern day a suitable place to set their fiction. Now it seems they no longer even consider the fiction part necessary.

Both Some Remarks and Distrust That Particular Flavor bear the finger prints of their respective creators, two of our most dependable outliers. With Some Remarks a bit woollier containing everthing from a most unexpected defense of Zack Snyder’s 300, to a brief history of Fiber Optics (as well as a history of the various battles between the two authors, plasma swords are involved.)  While Gibson is more precise and distant, trapping all his details in amber.

Both are  invaluable looks at the world from the pleasure of their cracked prism.

8. The Croning, Laird Barron: The jump from the short story to the novel is a tricky transition for any author, but particularly the horror author who is charged with transplanting his work from his genre’s natural habitat to much more inhospitable soil.

Fortunately with his first novel Laird Barron proves himself one of the authors capable of making the jump. Delivering a book with the same sense of shuddering decay that his best short work offers. Barron does, “cheat” a little bit, layering his book with short stories in the best Neil Gaiman puzzle box fashion. But as The Croning builds to its final awful whole, one cannot help but reflect that whatevee the format Barron is awful damn good.

7. Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn: “I’d hate to take a bite of you. You’re a cookie full of arsenic.”

It is one thing to have a book be extraordinarily popular and critically acclaimed. It is another thing to have a book be extra ordinarily popular and acclaimed and also be really, really good.  Come on Gillian Flynn what are you trying to do? Break my spirit?

And make no mistake Gone Girl is really, really good. The prose is of a “Why do I bother” quality, combined with a twisted gift for plotting, and an acerbic misanthropic world view. Patricia Highsmith would spit with envy.


6. Sacre Blue, Chris Moore: Those expecting the usual Christopher Moore maniac farce might walk away from Sacre Blue a bit disappointed. Sure, there are the usual pleasures of Moore at full bear. The word play, the bad behavior, donkeys, decapitations (sorry accident, couldn’t be helped) the unusually kind heart and of course the sex. But it is an unusually somber Moore who shows up and delivers an unexpectedly weighty and moving consideration of the burdens and prices of producing art. (Imagining Moore peaking over my shoulder I can’t help but picture him saying,  “Yes and the dick jokes, don’t forget those. There are some good ones in there.”)

There are some good ones in there, but there’s also a true sense of melancholy. The price the muse demands can at times be even worse than syphilis (though she has a fondness for that one)  and Moore writes of it with sympathy, and a conviction that it is worth it. It’s also a book where you can read about Toulouse LauTrec battling an immortal cave man. So you know, good times.



5. Redshirts, John Scalzi: Like Sacre Blue Scalzi presents what only looks like a weightless farce. The idea is irresitable, a crew of expendable one shot characters realize the nature of their plight. But for all the genre callbacks and Cabin In The Woods style, post modern shenanigans, what really gives Redshirts its depth is the frank examination of what we give to the things we create and what they give back. There is an awful lot in its much maligned three part ending about the nature of storytelling. Many complained about the sudden swerve, but it changes Redshirts from something clever, but necessarily shallow, to a truly substantial work of fiction.


4. The Twelve, Justin Cronin: I have figured out that I should just stop trying to figure out what Justin Cronin is trying to do.

The Passage left me stumbling and grasping every hundred pages or so, and The Twelve follows neatly in its footsteps, ignoring the clear narrative set up of the closing pages of The Passage in favor of a story that finds its central characters stuck in inertia while the world ends around them.

But the pleasures of Cronin’s world and story are, well not secondary, but rather a support system for what Cronin is able to convey with them. Elsewhere I have ventured that if it is the purpose of literary fiction to break the icy seas within ourselves, then perhaps it is genre fictions job to simply make us a little braver. With his story of courage in the face of loss and oblivion, I believe Cronin has accomplished just that. Writing an unforgettable cast of characters who are defined by the fact that when given a second chance, a chance to be better than they are, they more often rise to the occasion than not. In the books key segement a character responds to an unanswerable question with the words, “I could have held his hand.”  The moment he gets the opportunity to do just that is the most moving I’ve come across in fiction in quite awhile.

And that is the reason that for all its dark imagery, and operatic bleakness Cronin’s devasted world is one of profound optimism. The Zero may seek to end all things, but he won’t do it without a fight.



3. Telegraph Avenue, Michael Chabon: What can be said of Chabon’s novel. It possesses the kind of messy exuberance that Wolfe once had, before he, you know, died. But there is a warmth here that Wolfe never had, even at his most admiring. Like the area it documents Telegraph Avenue has the sprawling messiness of life, in the way that Chabon’s slightly neat hermetic work never really had.  It suits him


2. Live By Night, Dennis Lehane: Or as I like to think of it, Damn It Feels Good To Be A Gangster. While Live By Night's predecessor, The Given Day somewhat buckled under the weight of its admirable literary aspirations,  Live By Night is a lean work of glorious pure pulp the type that Lehane hasn’t delivered since Sacred. Rough, propulsive, and with Lehane’s trade mark economical weighty prose Live By Night was a kick to my particular set of literary pleasure receptors, with a directness that almost seems unfair to the other books on the list. 


1. This Book Is Full Of Spiders, David Wong: There is no more dangerous activity than trying to catch lightning in a bottle a second time. And make no mistake, John Dies At The End was lightning in a bottle. Everything from its piecemeal creation, to its novella structure, conspired to make it something completely unexpected. On this level This Book Is Full Of Spiders faced a near impossible task. By its very definition the reader had expectations for it.

So all credit to Jason Pargin (ie David Wong) who managed to find the improbable juke. Delivering a novel deeper, richer, scarier, funnier and on every level better than John. The growth that Pargin shows between the two books is staggering. It’s not every book that can scare the shit out of you, make you laugh, consider how deeply fucked we as a species might be and leave the reader with a resilient kernel of optimism all the same; all in the space of five pages. In short This Book Is Full Of Spiders delivers everything I ask from literature and it does it again and again and again.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Never Again


The woman was looking at her smartphone as I rang her up. This always annoys me.

“There was a shooting.” She said.

That’s not something that has an easy response. I think a non committal grunt was the best I could manage.

“At a school. Children.” She continued. Then she took her bag and left. I called the next person in line.

It’s not pretty, but it’s the truth that my first response on hearing the news wasn’t shock, wasn’t sorrow, just a numb base level revulsion, a feeling that can best be summed up by the thought, “This again?”

It wasn’t until I was sitting home alone that the full weight of the horror hit me. Yes, this. Again.

Here’s an anecdote, I’ve actually been working on a book which features at its center a choreographed shooting in a public place, and when I started outlining the book at the beginning of the year I was worried about this plot point because I was afraid it wouldn’t be believable.

Normally I rip through my first drafts pretty quickly. But this one has taken me a while. Not because of any difficulties with the story. Indeed I see this plot clearer than I have perhaps seen any other. But every few months it happens again and afterwards its weeks before I can stand to touch the fucking thing. First Aurora, then the tragedy at the Sikh temple, a smattering of lesser shootings throughout the year, and now this, the final (God willing) ugly culmination of this nightmare of a year.

I can hope that this last indelible tragedy might finally break the stranglehold the right has had on any talk of gun control. But I don’t hold my breath. What I save my real hope for is that the horror is at least felt. Because if we get to the point where we are so deadened that, “This again?” is our instinctive response we are truly and utterly lost once and for all.

So what do we do when we are left with horror. Well I for one went here. I try not to let my left hand know what my right hand is doing when it comes to charity. But today I don’t mind sharing. If like me you’re getting so overwhelmed by the presence of evil in the world that you are sliding towards out and out bafflement, then do some good. Do a positive concrete act. Do what you can to ease a little suffering.

It may be corny, but as long as we have that impulse we still have a fighting chance. 

EDIT: If you're looking for something else concrete to do, might I suggest going here.