Showing posts with label Jim Henson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim Henson. Show all posts

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Dreamchild



"But I wrote this just for you!"


While Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland is plenty of fun, but The Wonderland it portrays is relatively safe. While much of it is weird, in that trademark whimsical Burtony way, very little of it actually disturbs (In all fairness it’s a family movie and disturbing probably wasn’t what they where going for). If Carroll and Carroll’s book are anything though, they’re unsafe. That’s what gives Alice In Wonderland its potency, allowed it roll around popular culture for the last hundred years or so, popping up where it is least suspected. Dreamchild is a hard movie to find, but its well worth it, for anyone intrigued enough by Carrol’s work to want to know more about the man, not all of it pretty.

Dreamchild isn’t adapted from one of Carroll’s books per se. Instead it’s a fictionalized account of the “real” Alice’s trip to America in the nineteen thirties. Forced to recollect the books for the first time in years, and in failing mental and physical health, she finally realizes that Carroll was in love with her. That’s all good and icky, but things get worse when Alice’s remembrance of both her childhood and Wonderland start to bleed into the present day leaving the poor old lady in a warped fever dream version of reality.

These visualizations of Wonderland come courtesy of The Jim Henson company who do dark detailed work that would make Burton runaway screaming. The design and performance work cut directly to the character’s essence. There has always been something sinister about Wonderland. It’s as though it was created in equal parts by the unconscious and the intellect, taking the worst aspects of each. That’s part of the attraction. The puppet work brings it out clearly. Remember this is Henson in The Dark Crystal, Labryinth phase, he’s not afraid to go dark with his designs. Henson and his team embrace this intricate view of Carrol’s work fully, expressing his creations in all their id fueled glory.




(Oh Shit)

Indeed if the film has a problem its that it doesn’t go far enough. When the film focuses on Alice and the distorted wonderland, its darkly fascinating, but it focuses far too much of its time on the light romantic comedy subplot involving Alice’s ward and none other then the OC’s Peter Gallagher, who woos her with her eyebrows. Its not that these scenes are bad per se, its just that they seem so bizarrely out of place. They reflect on Alice, and her prudish repressed sexuality, partially courtesy of Carrol’s affections, but if that’s all they’re supposed to do they attract far too much attention on themselves. The mawkish thirties style romantic comedy constantly intruding on the darkness of the inner journey Alice goes through.

But its not a simple hatchet job, Dreamchild offers an honest but complex and ultimately sympathetic portrait of Carroll, aided by Ian Holm’s empathetic performance. Which pays full tribute to the man’s creative genius and imagination, not just his flaws. As both a study of Carroll’s life and work Dreamchild is unparalleled.

Monday, December 21, 2009

A Christmas Carol


Elwood over at From The Depths Of DVD Hell has asked some bloggers for their ultimate Christmas Movie. I’m going to be kind of uncreative here and say A Christmas Carol.

The very name might make you roll your eyes, A Christmas Carol is one of those stories that keeps getting retold and retold, it seems like every other Christmas there’s another version of the story. There’s a reason for this though. I don’t want to get controversial here but that Dickens guy was a pretty good writer. Carol is one of those rare pieces of work with a story so strong and themes so primal that you have to be a literal moron to fuck it up.

I just saw the Zememkis version of the new story, one which has caused quite a few people to assign the dunce cap to Zemekis. I for one liked it. Say what you will about Jim Carrey but if ever there was an actor designed for motion capture it was he. He does strong work as Scrooge and the three ghosts, bringing each to life with solid body work. Gary Oldman also does strong work as Marley and Cratchet (Tiny Tim as well though he barely amounts to a cameo) Colin Firth on the other hand still seems a bit stiff. The Three Christmas Ghosts are all very well animated, the idea of making The Ghost Of Christmas Future Scrooge’s literal Shadow works quite well. And the whole movie has a shockingly eerie tone, extending even to a surprisingly unjolly Ghost Of Christmas Present (Whose demise pushes the needle into gruesome)

I also have to give credit to Zemekis for fearlessly tackling the tougher parts of the book, that filmmakers are usually loathe to touch with a ten foot pole. The Ignorance and Want scene is here in all its didactic glory, as is the scene of the ghostly cavern over London, hell Zemekis even puts in the weird little rant the Ghost Of Christmas Present, has about the church closing down community kitchens on Sunday. Surely a hot button issue.

Still the movie’s not perfect, It rushes through things, particularly in the rather key Ghost Of Christmas Past, and features long interminable tech demos, that try to show you how awesome 3D looks with long frantic sequences of the camera following Scrooge as he rushes around. Its tough for me to describe how painfully uninteresting these scenes where. And will undoubtably become even more so once it reaches home video. Though in all fairness, Disney 3D has the best system right now. And on the whole I’d argue that A Christmas Carol makes a much better argument for the potential of Motion Capture and 3D then Avatar did.


But for me the ultimate version has to be A Muppet Christmas Carol. One of the few Christmas traditions my family actually manages to keep is the watching The Muppet Christmas Carol. And its still my favorite version of the story.

When stripped to its bare essentials A Christmas Carol is basically the story of someone’s personality having a complete meltdown by himself in its room. The sentiment that gets ladled on at the end comes after a surprisingly dark core. And for all the wise cracks A Muppet Christmas Carol remembers this, anchored by a surprisingly grave performance by Michael Caine. He never once winks at the material or his “actors”. Always more of a consummate pro then showboat in many ways Caine is the ideal actor to perform opposite Puppets with cut in half ping pong balls for eyes. A Muppet Christmas Carol was the first Muppet Movie Made after the death of Jim Henson, and it remains their most successful work without him. The work that retains the most of the beloved virtuoso’s spirit and style. It stands as a loving tribute to a master craftsman through the retelling of one of the most beloved stories of all time

One of the reasons A Christmas Carol continues to resonate is the way it avoids all the baggage that comes with the season. The message of A Christmas Carol has nothing to do with religion, its just asks “Wouldn’t it be nice if we all took one day when we weren’t such total bastards to each other?” Its one of those rare works of art that challenges you to be a better person without beating you over the head with sentiment and very special lessons.

I hope you have a Merry Christmas.