Seeing the original Fright Night at The Aero’s horrorthon
last year was one of the most pleasant surprises I had at a movie last year. I
was somehow all but virtually ignorant of the horror classic in all but the broadest strokes. This despite the film being so far down
my alley that it was practically breaking into my house to steal shit.
Yet I was still skeptical about seeking out the sequel. This
after all was not just any sequel but an Eighties Sequel. And it’s a general
rule of them that an eighties sequel is going to be beat for beat like the
original, expect a lot less enjoyable. I mean we are talking about a sub
classification of film that requires the line of dialogue “I can’t believe this
is happening… AGAIN!!!” to appear in nearly every single one of its entries.
But the lure of 35 mm and The Alamo Drafthouse proved too
straong, and I ended up seeing Fright Night Part II with a crowd better and
more primed for the film than the ones who sat through the film in 1988.
I wasn’t exactly wrong about what Fright Night Part II would
be, but there was a surprising amount of fun to be had to it. Once expectations
had been suitably lowered. Fright Night Part 2 takes place three years later
with Charlie Brewster just getting out of a stay at a mental institute and into
college. In this time period he’s been convinced that vampires don’t exist
(This is more than a little hard to swallow, but it’s another staple of
eighties sequels. If you’re going to repeat everything again you have to reduce
everything back to square one). This gets tricky when wouldn’t you know it, a
bunch of Vampires move into Charlie’s neighborhood and start stalking him and
Peter Vincent.
This time it’s a posse of Vampires, (They’ve also brought
along a ghoul and a werewolf played by ultimate 80’s genre character actor Jon
Gries) and unlike the suave, urbane, Chris Sarandon they are totally 80’s. You
have no idea how unintimidating a vampire on rollerblades is until you actually
see it.
But it is fun to watch William Ragsdale and Roddy McDowell
deal with it again, their chemistry intact (The film does suffer from the
absence of Amanda Bearse whose quintessential girl next door performance added
a lot to the film. Though her replacement is appealing as well.) McDowell in particular gets one
extremely fine moment where he gets to articulate his reason for being to the
incredulous patrons of a dingy bar. It may not justify the movie in and of
itself, but it goes a long way towards doing so.
The film also carries over the top notch practical gore and
monster effects from its predecessors. There’s no getting around the fact that
Fright Night Part II is just a fun movie to look at on a very basic level.
Watching Fright Night II is like clammering onto a carnival
spookhouse at the midstate fair for the second time. It’s predictable, more
than a little cheesy and you know every beat before it arrives. But there’s
still some fun to be had. Albeit not nearly as much as you did the first time around.
6 comments:
Yeah, isn't the original FRIGHT NIGHT one great blast of a movie? I re-watched it again in August, right before taking in the '11 remake (which was a surprisingly good update, IMO). But, back to the sequel. I think I very much agree with your assessment. It produced a decent good time, with an 80s charm. Definitely worth catching, if you've never seen it before. Keep'em coming, Bryce. Thanks.
"This despite the film being so far down my alley that it was practically breaking into my house to steal shit."
Still grinning at that one!
I'm glad you covered this film. I actually really enjoy it.
Yeah, I enjoy this one, and Im a huge fan of the original! But both films feel like they co-exist in the same universe, it doesnt feel like some sequels, where things just dont feel the same.
Nope on this one its Charlie and Peter back in action. Julie Carmen as they main villain was a genius choice, so beautiful!
Agree about the effects work, still top notch, at least the film wasnt a let down on this department either.
Jon Gries also played a werewolf on Monster Squad! But he is slightly more viscious on this one, the scene where he is squeezing blood out of a cold dead body (at the bowling alley) was pretty gruesome.
I just posted an article on my blog where I compare the original Fright Night with the remake, check it out, I think you'll enjoy it!
Fright Night II was a movie that was murdered by its distributor. I remember reading about it in the trades and looking forward to seeing it only to have it slink onto home video without ever playing in my vicinity. Which is a pity, because it wasn't a bad movie by any means. I'd claim that it has my favorite bowling scenes in movies, but for the fact that Kingpin exists.
@ le0: It's become one of my favorites. I wanted to see the remake, but had to choose between it and Don't Be Afraid Of The Dark. And I'm afraid my boy Del Toro is going to win out every time on that one.
@ Neil: Thank you sir.
@CDM: Thanks man there is a lot of fun to be had.
@ FC: Thanks man it was a great piece.
@ Vulvina: Good call on the bowling scene. Fright Night II seems as though it continues to get manhandled. The DVD was super limited, and Fool Screen only. If the remake was a hit maybe we would have gotten a decent release. But they didn't even put out a new edition of the original.
Post a Comment